Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ena Shibahara vs Tatiana Pieri Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shibahara vs Pieri analysis and find out who is favored!
Ena Shibahara vs Tatiana Pieri Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Shibahara 0 - 0 Pieri
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shibahara has won 53.96% of points on his second serve, while Pieri has won 46.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shibahara, in recent form, has won 56% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pieri has won 57.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.26% and 44.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shibahara has saved 56.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pieri has saved 54.23% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shibahara has won 68.52% of matches played (W/L 37/ 17), with Pieri winning 66.67% (W/L 48/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shibahara has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 10/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9). Pieri has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 216/ 158), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 15/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Shibahara has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.92% of matches (W/L 35/ 13), where as Pieri has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 48/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shibahara has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.65 while Pieri has played against players with an average rank of 263.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shibahara has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pieri has won 73% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shibahara has converted 48.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pieri has converted 52.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
279
Rank
279
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
366
Rank
366
High
25
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
58% (114-82)
Career Total W/L
56% (244-191)
78% (28-8)
YTD W/L
69% (24-11)
$28,143
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ena Shibahara | Tatiana Pieri |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 78% (28/8) | 69% (24/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (59/24) | 62% (51/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (450/342) | 56% (434/341) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 78% (25/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 69% (24/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 135 | 21 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 68 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:20 | 1:39:17 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 224.47 | 262.17 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1594/2504) | 65% (1409/2163) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (1052/1594) | 59% (827/1409) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (491/910) | 47% (352/754) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (148/306) | 52% (165/317) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1164/2588) | 49% (1103/2240) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 78% (28/8) | 69% (24/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 78% (28/36) | 69% (24/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (8/11) | 75% (9/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (28/26) | 95% (22/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (28/2) | 5% (22/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 23% (13/3) |
Ena Shibahara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Ena Shibahara
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Ena Shibahara
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Aneta Kladivova
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Gabriela Ce
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Ena Shibahara
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Ena Shibahara
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
47 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Mai Hontama
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
45 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Emina Bektas
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Valeria Savinykh
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
84%
(
43 of
51)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Naho Sato
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
82%
(
40 of
49)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Tatiana Pieri Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Tatiana Pieri
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Valeriya Strakhova
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Tamara Kostic
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Cristina Dinu
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
47%
(
37 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Veronika Podrez
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Alina Granwehr
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
41%
(
31 of
75)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
51%
(
35 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Tatiana Pieri
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Tatiana Pieri
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Natalia Szabanin
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
47%
(
47 of
99)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
6-0 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Shibahara Vs Pieri Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
